Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:54

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Where can I find BPO projects?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Nintendo Appears To Have Updated Donkey Kong Bananza's Switch 2 File Size - Nintendo Life
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What is it like to date a women 20 years younger than yourself?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
New Study Shows Disposable Vapes Are Worse Than Cigarettes - Rolling Stone
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How does gut health affect mental well-being?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How to protect yourself from ticks year-round - NBC News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Stopping alcoholism gets smarter with smartwatches - The Brighter Side of News
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.